In April 1963, Richard Feynman stood before a general audience at the University of Washington and delivered three public lectures that ranged far beyond his technical expertise in theoretical physics. Two years before receiving his Nobel Prize, he addressed fundamental questions about science’s place in society, the relationship between scientific and religious thinking, and the persistence of irrationality in an ostensibly modern age.
The lectures bore Feynman’s characteristic directness. In the first, The Uncertainty of Science, he articulated what distinguished scientific thinking from other modes of understanding: its embrace of doubt as a positive virtue rather than a weakness. Science, he argued, progressed precisely because it refused certainty, because it subjected every claim to the merciless judgment of observation and experiment. This skepticism was not merely a professional technique but a broader intellectual discipline applicable to all domains of human endeavor.
The second lecture examined the tension between scientific and religious worldviews with remarkable evenhandedness for that contentious era. Feynman neither dismissed religion nor claimed science could answer questions of meaning and value, but he insisted on intellectual honesty about the boundaries between empirical investigation and matters of faith.
The final lecture, This Unscientific Age, proved the most wide-ranging and prophetic. Feynman surveyed the landscape of pseudoscience—astrology, ESP, faith healing, flying saucers—and diagnosed a troubling paradox: technological sophistication coexisted with widespread indifference to scientific reasoning. The problem was not ignorance of scientific facts but unwillingness to apply scientific habits of mind beyond narrow technical domains.
“Looking back at the worst times, it always seems that they were times in which there were people who believed with absolute faith and absolute dogmatism in something.”
Richard Feynman (verified)
“Knowledge is of no real value if all you can tell me is what happened yesterday. It is necessary to tell what will happen tomorrow.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“I think that to keep trying new solutions is the way to do everything.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“There is no sense in calculating the probability or the chance that something happens after it happens.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“Every scientific law, every scientific principle, every statement of the results of an observation is some kind of a summary which leaves out details.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“The imagination of nature is far, far greater than the imagination of man.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“Observation is the ultimate and final judge of the truth of an idea.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“By honest I don’t mean that you only tell what’s true. But you make clear the entire situation. You make clear all the information that is required for somebody else who is intelligent to make up their mind.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)“It is interesting that human relationships, if there is an independent way of judging truth, can become unargumentative.”
— Richard Feynman (verified)• Title: The meaning of it all
• Author: Richard P. Feynman
• Type: Book
• Publisher: Addison-Wesley
• Publication time: 1998
• Publication place: United States
The World Crisis (1923-1931)
Winston Churchill
Compensation (1841)
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Source Code (2025)
Bill Gates
Autobiographical Notes (1949)
Albert Einstein